You are managing a government construction project with a fixed-price contract and a defined scope. Six months into the 18-month project, a new government regulation is enacted that requires additional safety measures, impacting 30% of the completed work and all remaining work. Your project team is demoralized because they believe they will need to redo work that was compliant at the time of completion. The compliance officer insists all work must meet the new standards before final acceptance. The sponsor indicates no additional budget is available and expects you to absorb the changes. During a team meeting, several senior team members openly criticize the sponsor's position and question the project's viability. How should you address this situation?

Question

Accepted Answer

The correct answer is C. This complex scenario requires both leadership in team management and proper contract/change management. Option C is correct because it addresses both dimensions appropriately: first, handling the team dysfunction through private coaching (maintaining respect while addressing professional conduct issues), and second, following proper predictive methodology by documenting impacts through formal change management processes. In a fixed-price contract, regulatory changes typically constitute a valid basis for contract modification. The project manager must advocate for the team while following appropriate channels. Option A, while appearing collaborative, bypasses the essential step of addressing the team's public criticism of the sponsor—allowing this to persist damages team dynamics and sponsor relationships. It also moves too quickly to legal discussions before proper impact analysis. Option B ignores both the legitimate contractual issue and the team's morale problem, essentially asking the team to solve an unfunded mandate. Option D focuses on historical risk identification rather than current problem resolution; whether or not the risk was identified, the situation requires formal change management now. This question tests integrated thinking about team leadership, stakeholder management, and contract administration in predictive projects.

More People Questions