During a portfolio planning session, your organization has identified eight high-value initiatives for the next quarter, but only has capacity for five teams. The product owners are present and have sized their initiatives using story points. Three initiatives are strategic bets with uncertain outcomes, while five have clear customer demand and proven business cases. The CFO wants to maximize ROI by selecting the five safest initiatives. The CTO argues for including at least two strategic bets to drive innovation. As the agile practice lead, you need to recommend a portfolio approach. Which recommendation best applies agile principles to this portfolio decision?

Question

Accepted Answer

The correct answer is B. Option B is correct because it balances value delivery with innovation while applying agile principles of empiricism and iterative funding. ECO Process Task 1.1 (execute project with urgency to deliver business value) and Process Task 5.2 (monitor and adapt delivery approach) support this approach. By explicitly allocating capacity to both categories and using validated learning cycles, the organization gains strategic flexibility while maintaining accountability. Option A is the main distractor—while WSJF is a valid prioritization tool, applying it uniformly across fundamentally different initiative types (proven vs. exploratory) ignores the different risk profiles and evaluation criteria needed. Strategic bets require experimentation and learning metrics, not just efficiency optimization. Option C dilutes focus and prevents teams from achieving flow on either type of work. Option D violates agile principles of focus and whole teams, creating resource contention and delays across all initiatives.

More Process Questions