PMP Practice Questions

You are managing a product development project using a stage-gate approach. The project is approaching the gate review for Phase 2 completion. During quality inspections, you discover that three of the fifteen deliverables have minor defects that do not prevent functionality but fall slightly below the quality standards documented in the quality management plan. Correcting these defects would take two weeks and consume the remaining schedule buffer. The gate review is scheduled for next week, and senior management is eager to proceed to Phase 3. What should you do?

July 10, 2026

You are managing an infrastructure project with a detailed WBS and network diagram. A key stakeholder requests the addition of a new feature that was not included in the original scope baseline. The change would provide significant value to end users and has strong executive support. After analysis, you determine the change would add three weeks to the schedule and increase costs by 8%. The change control board (CCB) has approved the change request. What should you do next?

July 10, 2026

Your manufacturing project has a Cost Performance Index (CPI) of 0.85 and a Schedule Performance Index (SPI) of 1.10. The project is 60% complete with six months remaining until the planned completion date. During the monthly steering committee meeting, the CFO expresses concern about the budget overrun and asks whether the project can be completed within the approved budget. What should you present to the steering committee?

July 10, 2026

You are leading a software development project using a waterfall methodology. During the testing phase, the QA team discovers that 15% of the delivered functionality does not meet the acceptance criteria defined in the requirements document. The development team claims the requirements were ambiguous and their interpretation was reasonable. The testing phase is scheduled to end in one week, and any rework will delay the go-live date. What is the most appropriate action?

July 10, 2026

You are managing a construction project using a predictive approach. During the execution phase, a supplier informs you that a critical material will be delayed by three weeks due to manufacturing issues. This delay will impact the critical path and push the project completion date beyond the contractual deadline. You have already exhausted schedule reserves on previous delays. The project sponsor is highly concerned about contractual penalties. What should you do first?

July 10, 2026

You are managing a complex systems integration project following a predictive lifecycle. Three months before a major milestone delivery, your technical lead identifies that integrating two vendor systems will require an interface component that was not in the original design. Without this component, the systems cannot communicate, and the milestone deliverable cannot function. Analysis shows: developing the interface will cost $185K and take 8 weeks; the milestone is on the critical path; contingency reserve has $120K remaining; and both vendors claim the interface requirement was implied in the SOW but not explicitly stated. Your legal team is investigating liability. What should you prioritize as project manager?

July 8, 2026

Your construction project is in month 18 of a 30-month schedule. A new environmental regulation has been enacted that requires additional soil remediation procedures for your project site. The regulation applies retroactively to work already completed. Your legal team estimates compliance will add $1.2M in costs and 3 months to the schedule. You have management reserve of $800K and schedule reserve of 6 weeks. The contract includes a force majeure clause and regulatory change provisions. Your CFO wants to minimize financial impact, your customer is concerned about schedule, and your legal counsel advises documenting everything for potential claims. What is your best course of action as the project manager?

July 8, 2026

You are managing a government defense project with strict predictive controls and a fixed-price contract. During the testing phase, quality inspections reveal that 18% of manufactured units fail to meet specification tolerances defined in the quality management plan. Investigation shows the root cause is a calibration drift in manufacturing equipment that began gradually six weeks ago. The cost of rework is $340,000, and recalibrating will halt production for one week, impacting the critical path. Your quality manager wants to adjust acceptance criteria to pass more units, your operations manager wants to continue production and rework later, and your sponsor wants to understand the control implications. What should you do first?

July 8, 2026

Your pharmaceutical project is developing a new drug delivery system using a predictive approach. During the design phase, a critical supplier notifies you that a key component's lead time has increased from 8 weeks to 20 weeks due to raw material shortages. This component is needed for three activities on the critical path and two on a near-critical path (total float of 5 days). The project is currently on schedule, and regulatory submission deadlines are contractually fixed. Your team proposes four risk response strategies. Which response best addresses this threat while maintaining predictive project controls?

July 8, 2026

You are managing a complex infrastructure project with a 24-month timeline and a $15M budget. During month 14, earned value analysis shows: PV = $8.5M, EV = $7.2M, AC = $8.1M. The project has experienced significant scope changes, and three critical path activities are behind schedule. Your sponsor asks for a realistic forecast of final project cost and wants to understand if the current cost performance will continue. Considering the CPI trend has been declining over the past four months from 0.92 to 0.89, what is the most appropriate estimate at completion (EAC) to present?

July 8, 2026

You are managing a product development project using a hybrid approach: market research and regulatory approval follow a stage-gate process, while the product design team works in 2-week sprints. Gate 3 approval requires completed safety testing documentation that depends on design specifications from Sprint 8. Currently in Sprint 5, the design team wants to pivot based on user feedback that suggests a significantly different approach with better market potential but would require new safety protocols. The gate review is scheduled in 8 weeks, and delay would miss a critical industry conference launch window. The product owner supports the pivot for competitive advantage. What should you prioritize?

July 7, 2026

Your organization is executing a hybrid project to implement an enterprise system. The data migration and infrastructure components use a predictive approach with detailed WBS and Gantt charts, while business process customization follows Scrum. During the fourth sprint, the team discovers that the assumed data structure from the migration plan is incompatible with a critical business process they're configuring. Resolving this requires changes to both the migration approach and already-completed sprint work. The infrastructure team resists changes to their plan, citing baseline control processes. What is the best way to proceed?

July 7, 2026

You are leading a transformation project using a hybrid approach where infrastructure deployment follows a predictive model and application features are developed iteratively. The project baseline includes a fixed budget of $2M and a 12-month timeline. After 6 months and $1.1M spent, earned value analysis shows CPI of 0.91 and SPI of 0.88. Meanwhile, the adaptive track has delivered 45% of planned story points with high stakeholder satisfaction. The sponsor questions whether the project is failing and considers cancellation. How should you respond?

July 7, 2026

Your hybrid project uses time-boxed iterations for software development and a phase-gate approach for hardware components. During iteration review, the team demonstrates completed software features, but stakeholders from the hardware division express concern that integration testing cannot occur until their component passes the design gate in 6 weeks. The software features cannot be released independently and are accumulating as technical inventory. Velocity metrics show the team is productive, but no value is being delivered to customers. What is the most appropriate action?

July 7, 2026

You are managing a hybrid project where regulatory compliance features are being developed using a predictive approach while customer-facing enhancements follow Scrum. During sprint planning, the development team identifies dependencies between a compliance module (scheduled for completion in 3 months per the WBS) and a user interface feature planned for the current sprint. The compliance module is on the critical path and any acceleration would require additional resources. The product owner insists the UI feature delivers significant customer value and should not be delayed. What should you do first?

July 7, 2026

An agile team working on a financial services application has maintained a consistent velocity of 28-32 story points over the past six sprints. During Sprint 7 planning, the team estimates several user stories and realizes they are consistently giving higher estimates than in previous sprints for similar work. When asked, team members mention they are concerned about upcoming regulatory requirements that might require rework, though the specific requirements won't be finalized until next quarter. The Product Owner is concerned that velocity is decreasing. What should the team do to address this situation?

July 7, 2026

A cross-functional agile team is building a data analytics platform. During Sprint 6, a critical production bug is discovered in functionality delivered two sprints ago that is affecting customer reporting. Fixing the bug will require approximately 13 story points of effort. The current sprint backlog contains 32 story points of planned work, matching the team's average velocity. The Product Owner wants to add the bug fix to the current sprint without removing any planned stories. What should the Scrum Master recommend?

July 7, 2026

An agile team is developing a customer relationship management (CRM) system. After the fourth sprint, the Product Owner reviews the increment during the sprint review and realizes that several features don't match what key stakeholders envisioned. The stakeholders are present and express concern that the product is heading in the wrong direction. The development team is frustrated because they built exactly what was described in the user stories. The team's definition of done includes code review, testing, and documentation. What is the most likely root cause of this issue?

July 7, 2026

A software development team is working on an e-commerce platform using two-week sprints. During sprint planning for Sprint 5, the Product Owner presents 15 user stories totaling 55 story points. Based on their velocity from the last three sprints (average: 34 story points), the team knows they cannot complete all stories. The Product Owner insists all stories are critical for an upcoming trade show demo in four weeks. The team is concerned about committing to work they cannot complete. What is the best approach for the team to take?

July 7, 2026

Your agile team has completed three sprints of a mobile application project. During the sprint retrospective, several team members express frustration that they are spending too much time in meetings and not enough time developing features. The Scrum Master notes that the team is attending daily standups, sprint planning, sprint reviews, sprint retrospectives, and several ad-hoc meetings called by stakeholders. Velocity has declined from 32 story points in Sprint 1 to 21 story points in Sprint 3. What should the Scrum Master do first to address this issue?

July 7, 2026

You are managing a product development project using a predictive approach. The project management plan has been approved and execution has begun. During a team meeting, you realize that several team members are unclear about their specific responsibilities and who has decision-making authority for various project activities. This confusion is beginning to cause delays. What document should you reference or update to clarify these roles and responsibilities?

July 2, 2026

You are leading a predictive infrastructure project that is currently in the executing phase. A stakeholder who was not involved in initial planning requests a significant change to the project scope that would add new deliverables. The stakeholder insists the change is critical and wants it implemented immediately. What is the most appropriate action to take?

July 2, 2026

You are managing a manufacturing project to develop a new product line. During the execution phase, one of your team members discovers that a delivered component does not meet the specifications documented in the project requirements. The supplier claims the component meets industry standards, but it clearly does not match what was agreed upon in the procurement contract. What should be your first step?

July 2, 2026

You are planning a software implementation project for a financial services company. The project sponsor has approved a budget of $500,000. During cost planning, you need to establish a performance measurement baseline that will be used to monitor and control project costs throughout execution. The baseline should integrate scope, schedule, and cost to enable earned value management. What should you create?

July 2, 2026

You are managing a construction project to build a new office building. During the planning phase, you need to determine the total project duration by analyzing the sequence of activities and their dependencies. You have identified all activities, estimated their durations, and mapped out their logical relationships. What technique should you use to calculate the longest path through the project and identify the minimum project duration?

July 2, 2026