PMP Practice Question: People — Predictive, Hard
You are managing a defense contractor project with 30 team members working on classified deliverables. Three months into the project, a key architect who designed the overall solution structure has received a more lucrative offer from a competitor and will leave in two weeks. This architect's knowledge is essential for the next phase, and direct replacement is complicated by security clearance requirements that take 4-6 months. You have identified an internal candidate with relevant experience but who lacks the specific domain expertise. The project baseline includes detailed technical specifications, but much of the architect's design rationale exists only in email threads and meeting notes. Your sponsor is pressing you to maintain the current schedule. What is your best course of action?
Study this topic
- 📖AI in Project Management: Your 2026 PMP Exam Guide
Master AI concepts for the 2026 PMP exam. Learn how artificial intelligence impacts project management, what you need to know for test day, and practical applications.
- 📖Dependencies and Sequencing in Project Scheduling
Master the logic of task dependencies and sequencing to build realistic, defensible project schedules that account for constraints and optimize resource flow.
- 🗂️Flashcards: Risk Responses, Reserves & Contract Types
14 cards · quick recall practice
More People Questions
View all →You are leading a manufacturing facility construction project following a predictive lifecycle. The project team consists of 15 members, including contractors and internal staff. After three months of work, you receive feedback from several team members that the weekly status meetings are too long and not productive. Team members feel they spend too much time listening to updates irrelevant to their work. The meetings currently last 90 minutes and cover all work packages. What is the best approach to address this concern?
A cross-functional agile team is preparing for their next sprint. During sprint planning, the QA specialist expresses concern that the team has been committing to user stories without adequately considering testing effort. She feels that her input is often sought too late in the process, after developers have already estimated and committed to stories. This has resulted in quality issues and testing becoming a bottleneck in the last two sprints. The team wants to improve but is unsure how to better integrate QA perspective earlier. What should the team do?
Your organization is piloting agile practices within traditionally predictive portfolios. You're leading a hybrid project with a co-located agile team and distributed predictive workstreams across three continents. After four months, you notice the agile team has strong cohesion and high performance, but the distributed predictive teams report feeling disconnected and undervalued. Several key resources from the predictive workstreams have requested transfers, citing lack of engagement. Executive stakeholders are questioning whether the hybrid approach is sustainable. What is the MOST effective way to address this disparity?