You are leading a pharmaceutical product development project following a waterfall methodology with strict regulatory requirements. Your quality manager reports that three team members from the testing department have been consistently missing defect documentation deadlines, causing delays in the validation phase. Upon investigation, you discover these team members are also assigned to two other critical projects and are working 60-70 hours per week. The functional manager states they cannot provide additional resources due to budget constraints. The testing phase must be completed in four weeks to meet the regulatory submission deadline. What is the MOST effective approach to address this situation?

Question

Accepted Answer

The correct answer is A. This scenario requires addressing the root cause of overallocation while maintaining the critical deadline. Option A applies proper resource management by working collaboratively with the functional manager and other project managers to balance workloads across the portfolio, which is a fundamental responsibility in a matrix organization using predictive approaches (ECO People Task 1.3). This solution addresses the systemic problem of resource overallocation while respecting organizational constraints and maintaining team well-being. Option C, the main distractor, might seem appropriate given regulatory concerns, but immediately escalating without attempting to resolve through proper resource management channels fails to demonstrate project manager competency in conflict resolution and stakeholder management. Additionally, extending the timeline may not be feasible given regulatory windows. Options B and D treat symptoms rather than causes: mandatory overtime on already burned-out team members risks quality and safety issues in a pharmaceutical context, while simplifying documentation could compromise regulatory compliance. The question tests understanding of resource management in matrix organizations and proper escalation protocols.

More People Questions