You are managing an infrastructure project with multiple external vendors. One vendor has consistently missed milestone dates, causing delays to dependent activities. You have documented these issues and discussed them in previous status meetings. The vendor's project manager claims their delays are due to incomplete information from your team, though your records show all required information was provided on schedule. The vendor is now 10 days behind on a critical path activity. What is the MOST appropriate next step?

Question

Accepted Answer

The correct answer is A. Escalation is appropriate because previous attempts to resolve the issue have failed, the vendor is on the critical path causing project impact, and there's a dispute about responsibility despite documented evidence. Escalation brings in decision-makers who can authorize contract remedies or resource changes. Option D might seem collaborative, but you've already had discussions in status meetings, and the vendor is making unsubstantiated claims; further meetings without escalation won't resolve the pattern. Option B addresses symptoms rather than the root cause and may not be sufficient. Option C could breach contract terms (payment withholding usually requires specific contractual triggers) and might escalate conflict rather than resolve it through proper channels.

PMP Practice Question: Process — Predictive, Medium

More Process Questions