You are managing a product development project for a manufacturing company. A team member from the quality assurance department approaches you privately and expresses concern that another team member from engineering has been taking shortcuts in the testing protocols to meet schedule deadlines. The QA team member has evidence of incomplete test documentation but is reluctant to raise the issue directly because the engineering team member is senior and well-connected in the organization. The project is currently showing green status, but you know that quality issues could have serious compliance implications. How should you address this situation?

Question

Accepted Answer

The correct answer is A. Investigating objectively while protecting the reporting team member addresses both the potential quality issue and the team dynamics concern (ECO People Task 1.4 - Empower team members and stakeholders, and Process Task 4.2 - Engage stakeholders). This approach takes the concern seriously, verifies facts before taking action, and creates a safe environment for team members to raise issues. Option B, while promoting direct communication, ignores the power dynamics and potential intimidation factor that the QA member has already identified. Option C could expose the QA member to retaliation and may not be appropriate until facts are verified. Option D is premature escalation before investigating and could damage team relationships and organizational credibility if the claims are unfounded or misunderstood.

PMP Practice Question: People — Predictive, Medium

More People Questions