Your construction project team has been working for four months following a detailed WBS and schedule baseline. You notice during status meetings that one of your experienced engineers consistently provides optimistic progress reports, but when you review actual deliverables, the work is 2-3 weeks behind what was reported. Other team members have begun making comments about this engineer's reliability. The engineer is technically competent and has delivered quality work in the past. What is the most appropriate action?

Question

Accepted Answer

The correct answer is B. A private one-on-one conversation (Option B) is the most appropriate first step, allowing you to understand the root cause—whether it's misunderstanding of what constitutes completion, pressure to show progress, personal issues affecting work, or estimation challenges—without embarrassing the team member publicly. This approach respects the individual while addressing the performance issue directly, which is essential for maintaining trust and team morale. Option A is the main distractor because publicly addressing individual performance issues can damage trust, humiliate the team member, and create a defensive rather than collaborative atmosphere. While transparency is important, personnel issues should be handled privately first. Options C and D create bureaucratic overhead affecting the entire team for one person's issue and may damage overall team morale and trust.

More People Questions