PMP Practice Question: People — Agile, Medium
You are leading an agile project with a newly formed team. During the first two sprints, you notice that one team member, Sarah, consistently remains quiet during daily stand-ups and retrospectives. When she does speak, her contributions are valuable, but she appears uncomfortable in group settings. Other team members have started making decisions without her input. The team's velocity is acceptable, but you sense Sarah's potential is not being fully utilized. What should you do first to address this situation?
Study this topic
- 📖Managing Virtual and Remote Project Teams: A PMP Perspective
Learn proven strategies for leading distributed teams effectively, from communication protocols to trust-building, aligned with PMBOK 8th Edition principles.
- 📖Motivating Teams Through Servant Leadership Principles
Discover how servant leadership transforms project team motivation by putting people first, removing obstacles, and creating environments where teams thrive and deliver exceptional value.
- 🗂️Flashcards: Leadership, Team & Stakeholder Models
15 cards · quick recall practice
More People Questions
View all →You are leading a manufacturing facility construction project following a predictive lifecycle. The project team consists of 15 members, including contractors and internal staff. After three months of work, you receive feedback from several team members that the weekly status meetings are too long and not productive. Team members feel they spend too much time listening to updates irrelevant to their work. The meetings currently last 90 minutes and cover all work packages. What is the best approach to address this concern?
A cross-functional agile team is preparing for their next sprint. During sprint planning, the QA specialist expresses concern that the team has been committing to user stories without adequately considering testing effort. She feels that her input is often sought too late in the process, after developers have already estimated and committed to stories. This has resulted in quality issues and testing becoming a bottleneck in the last two sprints. The team wants to improve but is unsure how to better integrate QA perspective earlier. What should the team do?
Your organization is piloting agile practices within traditionally predictive portfolios. You're leading a hybrid project with a co-located agile team and distributed predictive workstreams across three continents. After four months, you notice the agile team has strong cohesion and high performance, but the distributed predictive teams report feeling disconnected and undervalued. Several key resources from the predictive workstreams have requested transfers, citing lack of engagement. Executive stakeholders are questioning whether the hybrid approach is sustainable. What is the MOST effective way to address this disparity?