You are managing a construction and technology project using a hybrid approach. Physical construction follows a critical path method schedule, while the building automation system development uses Kanban. The construction team has identified that they will complete the electrical rough-in two weeks ahead of schedule, which would allow the automation team to begin installation earlier than planned. However, the automation team's Kanban board shows they are currently focused on software configuration and have not yet started the installation work packages. What should you do?

Question

Accepted Answer

The correct answer is A. Option A is correct because it respects both methodologies while exploring value optimization. In hybrid projects, schedule changes in one methodology should be evaluated collaboratively with teams using other methodologies. The discussion allows teams to assess whether early start creates value, whether it's technically feasible, and whether it violates Kanban principles like WIP limits. This collaborative approach may reveal opportunities or constraints not visible to either team alone. Option D is the main distractor because while it appears to respect the pull-based nature of Kanban, it doesn't address whether acceleration is actually beneficial or feasible. Simply adding work to the board without facilitated discussion misses the opportunity for integrated planning and may create pressure that undermines the Kanban team's flow. This aligns with ECO Process Task 14 (establish project governance structure) and supports integrated decision-making in hybrid environments.

More Process Questions