PMP Practice Question: People — Predictive, Medium
You are managing a bridge construction project with a 36-month timeline and a team of 45 people including engineers, construction workers, and safety officers. The project is performing well against the baseline, with CPI at 1.02 and SPI at 0.98. During month 12, your construction superintendent, who has 20 years of experience and has been instrumental in maintaining quality and safety standards, submits a resignation letter citing a better opportunity. The construction superintendent is not easily replaceable due to specialized knowledge of the bridge design and local regulations. What is your most important immediate action?
Study this topic
- 📖How to Document Project Hours for Your PMP Application
Master the art of documenting your project experience for the PMP application. Learn what PMI accepts, how to calculate hours accurately, and see real-world sample entries.
- 📖AI and Automation: What the PMP Exam Tests in 2026
The 2026 PMP exam introduces AI and automation as testable topics. Learn what you need to know about AI tools, ethical considerations, and integration strategies.
- 🗂️Flashcards: Leadership, Team & Stakeholder Models
15 cards · quick recall practice
More People Questions
View all →You are leading a manufacturing facility construction project following a predictive lifecycle. The project team consists of 15 members, including contractors and internal staff. After three months of work, you receive feedback from several team members that the weekly status meetings are too long and not productive. Team members feel they spend too much time listening to updates irrelevant to their work. The meetings currently last 90 minutes and cover all work packages. What is the best approach to address this concern?
A cross-functional agile team is preparing for their next sprint. During sprint planning, the QA specialist expresses concern that the team has been committing to user stories without adequately considering testing effort. She feels that her input is often sought too late in the process, after developers have already estimated and committed to stories. This has resulted in quality issues and testing becoming a bottleneck in the last two sprints. The team wants to improve but is unsure how to better integrate QA perspective earlier. What should the team do?
Your organization is piloting agile practices within traditionally predictive portfolios. You're leading a hybrid project with a co-located agile team and distributed predictive workstreams across three continents. After four months, you notice the agile team has strong cohesion and high performance, but the distributed predictive teams report feeling disconnected and undervalued. Several key resources from the predictive workstreams have requested transfers, citing lack of engagement. Executive stakeholders are questioning whether the hybrid approach is sustainable. What is the MOST effective way to address this disparity?