You are leading a hybrid project to modernize a manufacturing execution system. The data migration component follows a waterfall approach due to regulatory validation requirements, while new features are developed using Kanban. Three months into the project, your organization announces a merger that will require integrating data from the acquired company's systems - significantly expanding the data migration scope. The Kanban team has been delivering features steadily, but these features depend on the data migration being complete. The project budget is fixed, and the regulatory validation timeline cannot be compressed. Senior management wants to know how you will handle this change without delaying time-to-market. What is the BEST approach?

Question

Accepted Answer

The correct answer is A. Option A is correct because it applies adaptive planning principles to a constrained hybrid environment (ECO Process Task 2.3 - Manage communications). By analyzing the value stream and decoupling features that don't require the expanded data migration, you can continue delivering business value while the predictive component handles the increased complexity. This maximizes value delivery within constraints and addresses management's time-to-market concern. Option B, while procedurally correct, doesn't explore alternatives before escalating and may not be acceptable given the fixed budget constraint. Option C is unrealistic - regulatory bodies have established validation requirements that typically cannot be negotiated on a project-by-project basis. Option D artificially splits the problem and likely creates significant rework and integration challenges, ultimately costing more and delivering less value than an integrated approach that sequences work intelligently.

PMP Practice Question: Process — Hybrid, Hard

More Process Questions