An engineering project is using a hybrid delivery approach where hardware development follows a stage-gate process while software features are developed using Kanban. The project is preparing for the gate 3 review which requires demonstrable integration between hardware and software. The software team's Kanban board shows several features in progress, but only 40% of planned integration points have been completed. The hardware team is ready for the gate review and cannot proceed to the next stage without approval. Senior management is pressuring for the gate review to proceed as scheduled. What is the MOST appropriate action?

Question

Accepted Answer

The correct answer is A. The correct answer addresses the core issue by facilitating collaboration to define what is truly needed for a successful gate review (minimum viable integration), while also applying Kanban principles by limiting WIP to focus on priority work. This respects both the stage-gate governance requirements and Kanban methodology. Option C is the main distractor because increasing WIP limits contradicts Kanban principles and would likely reduce quality and throughput rather than improve them. In Kanban, increasing WIP typically leads to longer cycle times and more context switching. The solution in hybrid environments is not to compromise the principles of either methodology but to find integration points that respect both approaches while delivering necessary outcomes.

More Process Questions