Your distributed agile team spans three time zones across North America, Europe, and Asia. Team members have been complaining that the daily stand-up time (9 AM EST) requires the Asia-based developers to join at midnight their time, and they often appear disengaged. Sprint productivity has been declining, and the Asia-based team members recently missed several critical integration issues that could have been caught earlier. The European team members have also expressed concerns about work-life balance. What is the best way to address this challenge?

Question

Accepted Answer

The correct answer is B. Option B is correct because it maintains daily communication and transparency while respecting all team members' time zones and work-life balance, which is essential for distributed team engagement (People Domain). Asynchronous stand-ups can be equally effective when teams commit to timely written updates and reading others' updates; this approach ensures everyone stays informed without requiring midnight meetings. Option A is the main distractor that seems fair on the surface, but rotating inconvenient meeting times means everyone suffers periodically rather than solving the fundamental problem, and it doesn't address the declining engagement. Option C fragments the team and reduces collaboration opportunities that help catch integration issues early, while Option D creates a two-tiered team structure where some members are less engaged and informed.

PMP Practice Question: People — Agile, Medium

More People Questions