PMP Practice Question: People — Predictive, Medium
Your predictive construction project has a baseline schedule of 18 months with defined milestones. You have a team of 40 people including contractors and full-time employees. The project sponsor has just informed you that due to budget constraints, three of your planned team members will not be available for the next phase starting in two months. These positions were critical to the resource management plan. The sponsor asks you to proceed with the reduced team and maintain the original schedule. What should you do first?
Study this topic
- 📖How to Document Project Hours for Your PMP Application
Master the art of documenting your project experience for the PMP application. Learn what PMI accepts, how to calculate hours accurately, and see real-world sample entries.
- 📖Scope Management: Defining and Controlling What Your Project Delivers
Master scope management techniques that prevent scope creep, ensure stakeholder alignment, and deliver exactly what your project commits to achieve.
- 🗂️Flashcards: Leadership, Team & Stakeholder Models
15 cards · quick recall practice
More People Questions
View all →You are leading a manufacturing facility construction project following a predictive lifecycle. The project team consists of 15 members, including contractors and internal staff. After three months of work, you receive feedback from several team members that the weekly status meetings are too long and not productive. Team members feel they spend too much time listening to updates irrelevant to their work. The meetings currently last 90 minutes and cover all work packages. What is the best approach to address this concern?
A cross-functional agile team is preparing for their next sprint. During sprint planning, the QA specialist expresses concern that the team has been committing to user stories without adequately considering testing effort. She feels that her input is often sought too late in the process, after developers have already estimated and committed to stories. This has resulted in quality issues and testing becoming a bottleneck in the last two sprints. The team wants to improve but is unsure how to better integrate QA perspective earlier. What should the team do?
Your organization is piloting agile practices within traditionally predictive portfolios. You're leading a hybrid project with a co-located agile team and distributed predictive workstreams across three continents. After four months, you notice the agile team has strong cohesion and high performance, but the distributed predictive teams report feeling disconnected and undervalued. Several key resources from the predictive workstreams have requested transfers, citing lack of engagement. Executive stakeholders are questioning whether the hybrid approach is sustainable. What is the MOST effective way to address this disparity?