PMP Practice Questions

You are managing a predictive infrastructure project for a public utility company with a detailed WBS, approved baseline, and 24-month timeline. At month 16, a new CEO joins the organization and introduces a strategic initiative to adopt renewable energy sources. She directs that your project must now incorporate solar panel installations and battery storage systems, representing a 40% scope increase. The CEO expects the same completion date, stating 'we need to show renewable commitment to our board and regulators.' Your project sponsor privately tells you to 'make it work' to avoid conflict with the new executive. The additional scope has not gone through formal change control, and preliminary analysis suggests the original budget is insufficient. What is your best course of action?

July 29, 2026

Your organization has been awarded a predictive project to implement a financial system for a client in a country with strict data sovereignty laws. The project plan, developed six months ago, specified using your company's standard cloud infrastructure hosted in your home country. Two months into the eight-month project, the client's government issues new guidance clarifying that all financial data must be processed and stored within national borders with no exceptions. Your cloud provider has no data centers in the client's country and establishing one would take 14 months. The client will not grant an extension beyond 60 days. Senior management is considering proceeding with the original plan and addressing compliance 'later.' What should you do?

July 29, 2026

You are managing a predictive pharmaceutical research project that requires approval from multiple regulatory bodies across different countries. The project is structured with sequential phase gates, and investment in each subsequent phase depends on passing regulatory reviews. During Phase 2 clinical trials, preliminary data suggests the drug is effective but the European Medicines Agency (EMA) requests additional long-term safety data that was not originally planned, while the FDA is satisfied with current protocols. This additional study will cost $3.2 million and delay market entry by 18 months. Your CFO argues the company should focus only on FDA approval and enter the European market later. What should you recommend?

July 29, 2026

Your organization is executing a three-year government defense project using a predictive approach with strict earned value management (EVM) reporting requirements. At the 15-month progress review, the Cost Performance Index (CPI) is 0.78 and the Schedule Performance Index (SPI) is 0.82. The customer is threatening contract termination due to poor performance. Your executive sponsor suggests re-baselining the project to show improved metrics for the next reporting period. The original baseline was approved by all stakeholders including the government oversight committee. What is the most appropriate action?

July 29, 2026

You are managing a predictive construction project with a fixed-price contract worth $8 million. Six months into the 18-month project, a new environmental regulation is enacted that requires additional soil remediation work not included in the original scope. The customer insists this should be absorbed within the existing contract price, citing the fixed-price nature of the agreement. Your legal team confirms the regulation was not foreseeable at contract signing. The additional work is estimated at $450,000 and will add two months to the schedule. What should be your primary course of action?

July 29, 2026

Your pharmaceutical project team of 30 specialists is executing a predictive plan to develop regulatory submission documentation. You have one team member, a senior regulatory expert with 20 years of experience, who possesses unique knowledge critical to project success but consistently demonstrates poor mentoring skills, dismisses junior team members' questions as 'basic,' and has caused two junior regulatory writers to request transfers. The junior members are necessary for document production volume, but the senior expert's specialized knowledge of FDA interactions cannot be easily replaced. Your HR business partner has documented complaints but states the expert has not violated any policies. The project is at the midpoint and approaching critical regulatory milestones. What is your best approach?

July 27, 2026

You are leading a construction project that is 60% complete. During a routine team performance assessment, you discover that your site supervisor has been consistently inflating progress reports to make their team appear more productive. Upon investigation, you learn the supervisor was responding to intense pressure from the construction manager to meet aggressive milestones, and feared their team would be viewed negatively. The actual progress indicates the project is approximately 3 weeks behind schedule. The construction manager is unaware of the misreported data and is making decisions based on the inflated reports. What should you do?

July 27, 2026

You are managing a government defense project with strict security clearance requirements and a hierarchical organizational structure. A high-performing team member has been consistently delivering excellent technical work but has begun circumventing the established approval chain by directly contacting the client's technical lead to expedite decisions. While this has accelerated some approvals, your project sponsor has received a formal complaint from the client's program manager about protocol violations. The team member argues their actions have saved the project two weeks of schedule delays. How should you address this situation?

July 27, 2026

Your predictive project is entering month 8 of a 14-month schedule. Three team members who were critical resources for the design phase have been reassigned to other organizational priorities by their functional managers, despite your resource management plan identifying them as needed through month 10. The remaining team has the technical skills but lacks the institutional knowledge these members possessed. The project sponsor is pressuring you to maintain the original schedule. Performance reviews show current team morale is declining. What is your best course of action?

July 27, 2026

You are managing a large infrastructure project with a team of 45 members across engineering, procurement, and construction disciplines. During the execution phase, you notice that two senior engineers who must collaborate on critical path activities have fundamentally different working styles—one prefers detailed documentation and formal approvals, while the other favors quick decisions and minimal paperwork. Their conflict is causing delays in design reviews that are impacting the project schedule. The procurement lead suggests reassigning one engineer to a different work package. What should you do first?

July 27, 2026

You are leading a pharmaceutical research project to develop a new drug formulation. During risk identification workshops, your team identifies a risk that a key regulatory approval might be delayed by up to 6 months due to recent policy changes. The probability is assessed at 40% and the impact on project completion would be significant. What should you do with this information?

July 13, 2026

You are managing a product development project with a fixed budget of $500,000. At the end of month 3, your earned value analysis shows: Planned Value (PV) = $150,000, Earned Value (EV) = $120,000, and Actual Cost (AC) = $130,000. The project sponsor asks for a status update. What should you report about the project performance?

July 13, 2026

Your team is developing a project schedule for a manufacturing facility upgrade. You have identified all activities, sequenced them, and estimated their durations. Several team members have been assigned to multiple concurrent activities. What should you do next to complete the schedule development process?

July 13, 2026

You are managing a software implementation project using a waterfall approach. The testing phase has just begun, and the QA team reports that 15% of test cases are failing due to missing requirements that were not included in the requirements specification document approved three months ago. The client insists these requirements are essential. What is the best course of action?

July 13, 2026

You are managing a construction project to build a new office building. During the planning phase, you identify that specialized steel beams must be ordered from an overseas supplier with a 12-week lead time. The beams are needed in week 20 of the project schedule. Your team is currently in week 2 of the project. What should you do first?

July 13, 2026

You are managing a critical infrastructure project for a utility company with a 36-month timeline and a highly structured governance framework. Six months into execution, your most senior electrical engineer, who serves as a technical authority and mentors three junior engineers, begins showing signs of stress and reduced engagement. Their deliverable quality remains acceptable, but they are increasingly absent from team meetings, less responsive to questions, and have stopped participating in design reviews. Two junior engineers have privately expressed concern. When you meet with the engineer, they acknowledge feeling overwhelmed but are reluctant to discuss specifics, saying 'it's personal' and they'll work it out. Your next major design milestone requiring their expertise is in five weeks. The project has no schedule buffer. What is the MOST appropriate course of action?

July 13, 2026

You are managing a complex manufacturing facility upgrade project for an automotive supplier. The project has a fixed-price contract with milestone-based payments. Your project team includes 12 full-time employees and 18 contractors from three different vendors. At the 60% complete point, you learn that two contractors from Vendor A have been socializing with your client's procurement director outside of work and have mentioned they could deliver certain components 'more efficiently' if contracted directly by the client, bypassing your organization. Your contracts manager confirms this would violate the exclusivity clause in your vendor agreement. The contractors are performing well technically, and replacing them now would delay the project by 4-6 weeks, risking a $200,000 milestone payment. What should you do?

July 13, 2026

You are managing a defense contract project with 35 team members across four locations. The contract includes specific earned value management (EVM) reporting requirements. At the month 9 performance review, you notice that one remote team of eight developers consistently reports 100% completion of planned tasks on time, yet integration testing repeatedly uncovers significant defects requiring rework. The team lead is well-liked and has been with the company for 15 years. Other teams have expressed frustration about the rework burden. Your SPI is 1.02 but CPI is 0.87, partly due to these rework costs. When you discuss this with the team lead privately, they explain their team is working hard and meeting their commitments as they understand them. What is the MOST effective way to address this performance issue?

July 13, 2026

You are leading a pharmaceutical product development project following a waterfall approach. During the detailed design phase, your quality assurance lead raises concerns that the technical lead is making design decisions without consulting the regulatory compliance specialist, potentially creating future audit risks. When you investigate, you discover the technical lead believes the compliance specialist is being overly cautious and slowing down progress. The technical lead has 20 years of experience and has successfully delivered similar projects. The compliance specialist is newer to the company but has deep regulatory expertise. Your project has strict regulatory submission deadlines with significant financial penalties for delays. How should you address this situation?

July 13, 2026

You are managing a large government infrastructure project with a baseline budget of $45 million and a 24-month timeline. At month 16, a critical team member who holds specialized knowledge about legacy system integration submits their resignation, citing personal reasons. This team member has been instrumental in interfacing with three key stakeholders and possesses undocumented institutional knowledge. The project is currently on schedule but slightly over budget (CPI 0.92). Your sponsor is concerned about the impact on the upcoming integration phase scheduled to begin in three weeks. What should be your FIRST action to address this situation?

July 13, 2026

You are managing a manufacturing project to develop a new production line. During a risk review meeting, the engineering team identifies a potential risk: a key piece of automated equipment might not integrate properly with existing systems, which could delay commissioning by four weeks. The probability is assessed at 40% and the impact would be $150,000 in additional costs. After discussing response strategies, the team proposes purchasing a backup manual system for $45,000 that could be used if the integration fails. What risk response strategy does this represent?

July 13, 2026

You are managing an infrastructure project with a fixed budget of $2.5 million. At the end of month 4, your earned value analysis shows: PV = $800,000, EV = $750,000, AC = $825,000. The project is planned for 12 months total. Based on this information, senior management asks you to forecast the final project cost. What is the most appropriate estimate at completion (EAC) to present if you expect current performance to continue?

July 13, 2026

You are managing a pharmaceutical research project with strict regulatory requirements. During quality inspections, you discover that 15% of the test samples from the last production batch do not meet the acceptance criteria defined in the quality management plan. The lab supervisor suggests reworking the samples, while the quality manager recommends disposing of the batch and starting over. The rework would save two weeks but carries some risk. What should you do?

July 13, 2026

You are managing a software development project using a waterfall approach. During the design phase, your technical lead discovers that a third-party component you planned to integrate has been discontinued by the vendor. This component was included in the approved project scope and budget. The technical lead suggests two alternatives: building the component in-house or using a different vendor's solution with similar functionality but different technical specifications. What is the best course of action?

July 13, 2026

You are managing a construction project to build a new office building. During the execution phase, a key supplier notifies you that the specialized steel components will be delayed by three weeks due to manufacturing issues. The critical path includes the steel frame installation, and this delay will impact the project completion date. Your project sponsor is very concerned about meeting the contractual deadline. What should you do first?

July 13, 2026