Practice Questions
PMP Practice Questions
Scenario-based questions aligned with the 2026 PMP Exam Content Outline. All questions reviewed by a certified PMP before publishing.
145 questions found · page 3 of 6
You are leading a pharmaceutical research project with strict regulatory requirements. During a risk review meeting, your team identifies a new risk: a potential change in regulatory standards that could require significant protocol modifications. The probability is estimated at 30% and the impact would be a 4-month delay and $200,000 in additional costs. The change, if it occurs, would happen in approximately 6 months. Your risk response strategy includes creating a contingency plan. What should you do NEXT?
August 28, 2026
You are managing an infrastructure project with multiple external vendors. One vendor has consistently missed milestone dates, causing delays to dependent activities. You have documented these issues and discussed them in previous status meetings. The vendor's project manager claims their delays are due to incomplete information from your team, though your records show all required information was provided on schedule. The vendor is now 10 days behind on a critical path activity. What is the MOST appropriate next step?
August 28, 2026
Your manufacturing project is in the execution phase with a CPI of 0.92 and an SPI of 1.05. During a quality audit, the quality assurance team discovers that several deliverables do not meet the specifications defined in the quality management plan. The project sponsor is pleased with the schedule performance and is pressuring you to maintain the current pace. Rework to fix the quality issues would cost an additional $40,000 and require 2 weeks. What should you do?
August 28, 2026
You are managing a software development project following a waterfall methodology. The design phase has been completed and approved by stakeholders. During the development phase, the development team identifies that implementing a specific approved feature will require significant architectural changes that were not identified during design. The team estimates this will add 3 weeks to the schedule and $25,000 to the budget. The change would improve system performance but is not required to meet the original requirements. What is the BEST course of action?
August 28, 2026
You are managing a construction project using a predictive approach. During the execution phase, a key supplier notifies you that they cannot deliver critical materials on the originally agreed date due to manufacturing delays. This delay will impact activities on the critical path. The supplier offers to expedite shipping at an additional cost of $15,000, which would maintain the original schedule. Your project has a management reserve of $50,000 and a contingency reserve of $30,000. What should you do first?
August 28, 2026
You are leading an agile project to modernize a legacy insurance claims processing system. The team has completed 6 sprints with an average velocity of 28 story points. During backlog refinement for Sprint 7, the team is reviewing a complex user story estimated at 21 story points. The product owner wants this story included in the next sprint along with other stories totaling 15 points. Several team members express concern that the 21-point story is too large and poorly understood. What should you recommend?
August 28, 2026
Your development team is working on Sprint 7 of a customer relationship management (CRM) system. On day 8 of the 10-day sprint, the team discovers that a critical third-party API they planned to integrate has been deprecated by the vendor, making three of the six committed user stories impossible to complete as planned. The team's burndown chart shows they are otherwise on track. The product owner is concerned about meeting the sprint goal. What should you do?
August 28, 2026
You are managing an agile project for developing an e-commerce platform. At the end of Sprint 5, the team demonstrates the completed user stories to stakeholders. A major stakeholder sees the shopping cart functionality and requests significant changes to the user interface, saying it doesn't match their vision despite the original acceptance criteria being met. The product owner is uncertain because this stakeholder has significant influence. The requested changes would require approximately 2 sprints of rework. What is the best course of action?
August 28, 2026
Your agile team has completed their fourth sprint on a financial software project. During the retrospective, several team members mention that the daily standups have become status report meetings where everyone just talks to you, the project manager, rather than coordinating with each other. Team members seem disengaged, and blockers mentioned during standup often don't get resolved until the next day. The team says they don't find the standups valuable anymore. How should you address this situation?
August 28, 2026
You are leading an agile project to develop a mobile application for a retail client. During sprint planning, the product owner presents 15 user stories, but the development team estimates they can only complete 8 stories based on their historical velocity of 32 story points per sprint. The product owner insists all 15 stories are critical for the upcoming product demo in three weeks. The total estimate for all 15 stories is 60 story points. What should you do first?
August 28, 2026
During a sprint review, stakeholders see the completed user stories demonstrated but express concern that the features don't align with current market conditions, which have shifted significantly in the past month. The product owner acknowledges the market has changed but states that the product backlog was carefully prioritized at the project start and changing it now would be disruptive. The stakeholders request immediate changes to the roadmap. How should the team respond?
August 24, 2026
An agile project team has been using story points and velocity for sprint planning. After six sprints, a new team member joins who is much more experienced than the rest of the team and significantly increases productivity. The team's velocity jumps from an average of 32 points per sprint to 48 points. The product owner sees this increase and immediately adds more items to the upcoming sprint based on the new velocity. However, two weeks later, the experienced team member accepts a position at another company. What should the team have done differently?
August 24, 2026
A cross-functional agile team is developing a customer portal. After four sprints, the cumulative flow diagram shows that items are moving from 'In Development' to 'In Testing' quickly, but there is a growing bottleneck in the testing column, with an average of 12 items waiting for test completion while only 3-4 items are in development at any time. The testers report they are working at full capacity. What should the team do?
August 24, 2026
Your agile team has completed three sprints of a mobile application project. During the sprint retrospective, team members report that they consistently cannot complete all planned story points because unexpected production support issues from a legacy system consume 30-40% of their capacity each sprint. The product owner is frustrated with the reduced velocity and wants the team to commit to more story points. What should the scrum master do first?
August 24, 2026
Your Scrum team has a definition of done that includes code review, unit testing, and deployment to the staging environment. During sprint planning, the team realizes that one of the high-priority user stories will require changes to the production database schema, which according to organizational policy requires a change control board (CCB) approval that typically takes 5-7 business days. The sprint is only 10 business days long. What is the best approach?
August 24, 2026
You are leading a pharmaceutical project using a hybrid model where clinical trial protocols follow FDA-mandated predictive processes, while patient recruitment and engagement strategies use adaptive methods with two-week iterations. During a retrospective, the adaptive team identifies that current recruitment messaging isn't resonating with target demographics and wants to pivot their approach. However, any changes to patient-facing materials require review under the predictive compliance process, which takes four weeks. The trial needs to meet enrollment targets within three months. What is the most appropriate action?
August 20, 2026
Your organization is implementing a new financial system using a hybrid approach. Core system configuration follows a predictive waterfall methodology, while user interface customization uses Scrum. You are in month four of an eight-month project. The predictive stream reports on schedule with 50% completion, but the Scrum team's velocity has been declining for three sprints, and they've completed only 35% of anticipated story points. The product owner is frustrated with the pace. What should you do?
August 20, 2026
You are managing a construction project using a hybrid approach where procurement and permitting follow predictive methods, while interior design decisions use an adaptive approach with frequent client feedback loops. The permits have been delayed by two weeks, which will impact the construction schedule. The client is eager to continue making design decisions in their regular review sessions. Your project budget has limited contingency remaining. How should you proceed?
August 20, 2026
Your hybrid project uses waterfall for regulatory compliance activities and Scrum for product feature development. During sprint planning, the development team identifies dependencies on compliance documentation that won't be ready for another three weeks according to the predictive schedule. The product owner wants to prioritize high-value features that require this documentation. Several team members suggest working on lower-priority features first. What is the best approach?
August 20, 2026
You are managing a hybrid project where the design phase follows a predictive approach while development uses Scrum sprints. The design team has completed 70% of their work according to the project schedule, but stakeholders are now requesting significant design changes based on early market feedback. The development team is ready to start their first sprint but needs finalized designs. The project sponsor is concerned about timeline impacts. What should you do first?
August 20, 2026
You are managing a hybrid project to implement an enterprise resource planning (ERP) system. The system configuration follows a predictive approach with detailed requirements and formal testing phases, while the change management and user adoption activities use an adaptive approach with iterative training sessions and feedback loops. Your project is currently in the user acceptance testing (UAT) phase for the predictive stream. Users participating in UAT are providing feedback that should inform the next iteration of training materials in the adaptive stream, but the training team says they have already locked their next iteration plan and starting new work would disrupt their sprint commitment. How should you proceed?
August 16, 2026
Your hybrid project is developing a medical device with hardware components managed predictively due to manufacturing lead times and regulatory submissions, while the embedded software uses iterative development with monthly releases. You have just completed the third software iteration when the hardware team discovers a component obsolescence issue that will delay hardware delivery by two months. The software team has three more iterations of features planned that depend on the specific hardware configuration. What should you do?
August 16, 2026
You are leading a hybrid software development project where infrastructure deployment follows a predictive methodology with formal change control, while application features are developed using Kanban. During a retrospective, the development team expresses frustration that infrastructure changes take 3-4 weeks to implement through the change advisory board (CAB), creating bottlenecks for feature delivery. The infrastructure team is concerned that bypassing the CAB process could create security and stability risks. Several features are now blocked waiting for infrastructure changes. What is the best approach to address this issue?
August 16, 2026
Your organization is implementing a hybrid project to modernize its payment processing system. The core payment engine follows a waterfall approach with strict regulatory requirements and formal testing gates, while the mobile app interface is developed using Scrum with two-week sprints. You are currently planning the integration testing phase. The payment engine team requests a four-week notice before any integration point, while the Scrum team wants to integrate continuously as features are completed. How should you handle this conflict in integration approaches?
August 16, 2026
You are managing a hybrid project implementing a new customer relationship management (CRM) system. The infrastructure and data migration components follow a predictive approach with fixed deliverables, while the user interface customization uses iterative sprints. During the third sprint review, stakeholders request significant changes to the reporting dashboard that would require substantial rework to the data warehouse already built in the predictive phase. The data warehouse is 80% complete and on schedule. What should you do first?
August 16, 2026