Practice Questions
PMP Practice Questions
Scenario-based questions aligned with the 2026 PMP Exam Content Outline. All questions reviewed by a certified PMP before publishing.
85 questions found · page 3 of 4
An agile team working on a financial services application has maintained a consistent velocity of 28-32 story points over the past six sprints. During Sprint 7 planning, the team estimates several user stories and realizes they are consistently giving higher estimates than in previous sprints for similar work. When asked, team members mention they are concerned about upcoming regulatory requirements that might require rework, though the specific requirements won't be finalized until next quarter. The Product Owner is concerned that velocity is decreasing. What should the team do to address this situation?
July 7, 2026
A cross-functional agile team is building a data analytics platform. During Sprint 6, a critical production bug is discovered in functionality delivered two sprints ago that is affecting customer reporting. Fixing the bug will require approximately 13 story points of effort. The current sprint backlog contains 32 story points of planned work, matching the team's average velocity. The Product Owner wants to add the bug fix to the current sprint without removing any planned stories. What should the Scrum Master recommend?
July 7, 2026
An agile team is developing a customer relationship management (CRM) system. After the fourth sprint, the Product Owner reviews the increment during the sprint review and realizes that several features don't match what key stakeholders envisioned. The stakeholders are present and express concern that the product is heading in the wrong direction. The development team is frustrated because they built exactly what was described in the user stories. The team's definition of done includes code review, testing, and documentation. What is the most likely root cause of this issue?
July 7, 2026
A software development team is working on an e-commerce platform using two-week sprints. During sprint planning for Sprint 5, the Product Owner presents 15 user stories totaling 55 story points. Based on their velocity from the last three sprints (average: 34 story points), the team knows they cannot complete all stories. The Product Owner insists all stories are critical for an upcoming trade show demo in four weeks. The team is concerned about committing to work they cannot complete. What is the best approach for the team to take?
July 7, 2026
Your agile team has completed three sprints of a mobile application project. During the sprint retrospective, several team members express frustration that they are spending too much time in meetings and not enough time developing features. The Scrum Master notes that the team is attending daily standups, sprint planning, sprint reviews, sprint retrospectives, and several ad-hoc meetings called by stakeholders. Velocity has declined from 32 story points in Sprint 1 to 21 story points in Sprint 3. What should the Scrum Master do first to address this issue?
July 7, 2026
You are managing a hybrid project for developing a medical device, where regulatory compliance work follows a waterfall approach with formal documentation and sign-offs, while the user interface development uses Kanban. The regulatory team has just completed validation protocols that must be signed by the quality assurance director before UI testing can begin. However, the QA director is unexpectedly on medical leave for two weeks, and the UI team has already completed their work and is ready to begin testing. The QA director's delegate can review documents but doesn't have signature authority. What is the best approach?
June 26, 2026
Your organization is transitioning to hybrid project management. You are managing a project where requirements gathering and architecture design follow a plan-driven approach, while development and testing use Scrum with two-week sprints. After three sprints, the cumulative flow diagram shows that completed story points are consistently 20% below the planned velocity, while the predictive architecture work is on schedule. Stakeholders are concerned about meeting the final delivery date. What should be your primary focus?
June 26, 2026
You are leading a hybrid project where the design phase follows a predictive approach with fixed milestones, while implementation uses iterative delivery. During the third implementation iteration, the team discovers that a design assumption documented in the approved design specification is technically infeasible. Implementing the original design would require significant rework. The design phase gate was formally closed two months ago. How should you proceed?
June 26, 2026
Your hybrid project uses a predictive approach for hardware procurement and an adaptive approach for software development. During a sprint review, stakeholders request a significant feature enhancement that would require additional hardware components with a 10-week lead time. The current sprint has three weeks remaining, and four more sprints are planned. The product owner wants to add this feature to the product backlog immediately. What is the most appropriate action?
June 26, 2026
You are managing a hybrid project for a financial services company where the infrastructure team uses predictive methods while the application development team uses Scrum. The infrastructure team has completed their work package on schedule, but the development team needs an additional sprint to integrate a regulatory compliance feature that was just clarified by the legal department. The infrastructure lead is concerned about team members being reassigned if they remain idle. What should you do first?
June 26, 2026
You are managing a marketing campaign project using a hybrid approach. The creative content development uses Scrum sprints, while media buying and placement follow a predictive schedule tied to specific launch dates. During sprint review, stakeholders are extremely pleased with the creative work completed and want to launch two weeks earlier than planned. However, the media buying contracts are already finalized for the original dates, and changing them would incur significant penalties. How should you respond to this request?
June 20, 2026
Your construction project uses a hybrid approach where procurement and permitting follow predictive methods, while interior design selections use an iterative approach with the client. The general contractor has reported that the foundation work (on the predictive critical path) is 15% behind schedule due to weather delays. Meanwhile, the client wants to accelerate the interior design iterations to make faster decisions. The project has a fixed completion date for regulatory reasons. What should be your primary focus?
June 20, 2026
You are leading a healthcare application project using a hybrid methodology. Regulatory compliance requirements are managed through predictive planning with detailed documentation, while user interface features are developed using two-week Scrum sprints. During a retrospective, the development team reports frustration that compliance reviews are creating bottlenecks, as the compliance officer needs five business days to review each increment before it can be released to staging. This delay is impacting the team's ability to get timely feedback. What is the best approach to address this issue?
June 20, 2026
Your organization is implementing a new enterprise software system using a hybrid approach. The infrastructure setup and data migration follow a predictive waterfall model, while feature configuration and user acceptance testing use iterative cycles. You've just completed the second iteration of user testing when stakeholders request a major change to the data migration strategy that would affect already-configured features. The change would improve data quality but requires re-work of completed iterations. How should you handle this request?
June 20, 2026
You are managing a product development project using a hybrid approach where the design phase follows predictive practices while development uses Scrum. During sprint planning for the third development sprint, the team discovers that the design deliverables from the predictive phase are incomplete, missing critical UI specifications needed for the planned user stories. The design team operates on a different schedule and won't complete these specifications for another three weeks. What should you do first?
June 20, 2026
You are facilitating a project using a hybrid approach where requirements are gathered upfront but development occurs in two-week iterations. After four iterations, the team's velocity has been inconsistent: 28, 15, 32, and 18 story points respectively. The team reports that some iterations include significant work on technical infrastructure that doesn't directly relate to user stories but is necessary for the architecture. The project sponsor is concerned about the unpredictable pace and asks why the team cannot maintain consistent velocity. How should you address this situation?
June 7, 2026
During the eighth sprint of a twelve-sprint project to build an e-learning platform, your team completes a sprint review. The product owner and key stakeholders attend the demonstration, and while they acknowledge the functionality works as specified in the acceptance criteria, they express concern that the user interface is more complex than they expected. They mention that teachers, the primary users, may struggle to navigate the system without extensive training. The team followed the user stories and acceptance criteria exactly as written. What should happen next?
June 7, 2026
Your Kanban team is experiencing flow problems on a data migration project. The team's board shows 15 items in the 'In Progress' column, 8 items in 'Code Review', and only 3 items in 'Done' over the past two weeks. Team members report feeling overwhelmed and context-switching frequently between multiple work items. Lead time for items has increased from an average of 5 days to 12 days. The team lead suggests adding more people to help clear the backlog. What is the most appropriate action to improve flow?
June 7, 2026
You are leading a Scrum team developing a customer relationship management (CRM) system. During sprint planning, the product owner presents a high-priority user story estimated at 21 story points, which exceeds the team's average velocity of 35 points per two-week sprint. The product owner insists this feature is critical for an upcoming sales conference in three weeks and must be completed in the next sprint. Several team members suggest breaking down the story, but the product owner argues that all components must be delivered together to be valuable. How should you proceed?
June 7, 2026
Your agile team has completed three sprints of a mobile application development project. During the sprint retrospective, team members express frustration that they frequently discover integration issues late in the sprint when merging code. These issues require significant rework and have caused the team to miss their sprint goals in two of the last three sprints. The team asks for your guidance on how to address this recurring problem. What should you recommend?
June 7, 2026
You are managing a product launch project using a hybrid approach where marketing campaigns follow a predictive waterfall timeline tied to a fixed launch date, while product features are developed using Scrum. With two months until launch, the development team reports they can deliver 80% of planned features with high quality, but completing all features would require cutting testing time and accepting technical debt. Marketing has already committed to feature messaging in materials going to print next week. The product owner is willing to descope features, but marketing insists all advertised features must be delivered. How should you proceed?
June 2, 2026
Your hybrid project includes both custom software development (agile) and hardware procurement (predictive). During iteration planning, the agile team wants to demonstrate new features at the upcoming stakeholder review, but the hardware needed for the demonstration has a six-week procurement lead time that wasn't anticipated. The procurement manager states that emergency orders would exceed budget by 30% and requests approval. The team suggests using simulation software for the demonstration instead. What should you evaluate first before deciding?
June 2, 2026
You are leading a regulatory compliance project using a hybrid approach where legal requirements are managed predictively with sequential gate approvals, while technical implementation uses iterative sprints. After three sprints, the compliance team reviews the working software and identifies that two implemented features may not fully satisfy regulatory requirements. The development team argues that requirements were ambiguous and their interpretation was reasonable. The next compliance gate is in two weeks. What is the best course of action?
June 2, 2026
Your organization is implementing a new customer portal using a hybrid approach. The database migration follows a waterfall methodology with detailed planning, while the user interface development uses Kanban with continuous flow. The project charter specifies a fixed go-live date in four months. During the first retrospective, the UI team identifies that database schema decisions are blocking their work, causing significant wait time. Stakeholders are concerned about meeting the deadline. How should you address this integration challenge?
June 2, 2026
You are managing a hybrid project where the infrastructure team works in predictive mode with fixed milestones, while the application development team uses two-week Scrum sprints. During sprint planning, the development team commits to features that depend on network infrastructure scheduled for delivery in six weeks. Three sprints later, the infrastructure team reports a two-week delay due to vendor issues. The development team has partially completed dependent features and is requesting guidance on how to proceed. What should you do first?
June 2, 2026