PMP Practice Questions

A project team is using a hybrid approach where high-level milestones and deliverables were defined upfront, but the team uses two-week sprints to deliver increments. At the end of each sprint, the team holds a review session with stakeholders. A key stakeholder has missed the last three sprint reviews and is now complaining that the project is not meeting their expectations. What should the project manager do?

September 18, 2026

A hybrid project has a fixed budget approved by the steering committee, but features are being delivered iteratively based on business value. After completing 40% of the planned iterations, the project has spent 50% of the budget due to higher than expected infrastructure costs. The remaining features in the backlog are all considered high priority by stakeholders. What should the project manager do next?

September 18, 2026

A project manager is leading a hybrid project where the design phase was completed using a predictive approach, and now the team is moving into iterative development sprints. Several team members who were not involved in the design phase are confused about the project requirements. Velocity has been lower than expected in the first sprint. What should the project manager do?

September 18, 2026

A project team is using a hybrid approach where requirements are gathered upfront but development is executed in two-week sprints. The product owner has just requested a new feature that was not in the original project scope. The team has completed three sprints and has five more planned. What should the project manager do first?

September 18, 2026

A software development project is using a hybrid approach with a defined budget and timeline, but iterative delivery of features. During the third iteration, the team discovers that a core architectural component needs to be redesigned, which will impact the overall project schedule. The project sponsor is concerned about meeting the fixed deadline. What is the best way for the project manager to address this situation?

September 18, 2026

You are managing a construction project with a 24-month timeline and a fixed budget of $8 million. During month 6, you calculate that the Earned Value (EV) is $2.1 million, the Planned Value (PV) is $2.4 million, and the Actual Cost (AC) is $2.3 million. The project sponsor asks you to forecast the final project cost based on current performance trends. What should you report as the Estimate at Completion (EAC) assuming current cost performance continues?

September 18, 2026

You are leading a software development project using a waterfall approach. The design phase has been completed and approved by stakeholders. As the development phase begins, a key stakeholder requests a significant change to the user interface that would require redesigning several approved components. The change would add value but was not included in the original scope. The stakeholder insists this is just a clarification of the original requirements. What is your BEST course of action?

September 18, 2026

You are managing a bridge construction project with a 36-month duration and multiple work packages. The project is in month 12, and you are conducting a quality audit. You discover that concrete testing procedures documented in the quality management plan have not been consistently followed by the construction subcontractor for the past two months. The subcontractor claims the alternative testing methods they used are equivalent and meet industry standards. No structural failures have occurred. What should you do?

September 18, 2026

During the execution phase of a pharmaceutical manufacturing project, you discover that a critical piece of equipment specified in the project scope has been discontinued by the manufacturer. Three alternative equipment options are available, each with different costs, lead times, and technical specifications. One option closely matches the original specifications but costs 30% more and has a 3-month longer lead time. Another option costs the same but has reduced capacity. A third option is cheaper and faster but requires modifications to the facility design. What should you do FIRST?

September 18, 2026

You are managing a manufacturing project to deliver 500 custom components over 10 months. After 4 months, you have delivered 180 components. The project budget is $500,000, and you have spent $195,000 so far. According to the baseline schedule, you should have delivered 200 components by now. Senior management wants to know if the project will meet its deadline. What is the Schedule Performance Index (SPI) and what does it indicate about schedule performance?

September 18, 2026

You are leading a hybrid project to modernize a manufacturing execution system. The data migration component follows a waterfall approach due to regulatory validation requirements, while new features are developed using Kanban. Three months into the project, your organization announces a merger that will require integrating data from the acquired company's systems - significantly expanding the data migration scope. The Kanban team has been delivering features steadily, but these features depend on the data migration being complete. The project budget is fixed, and the regulatory validation timeline cannot be compressed. Senior management wants to know how you will handle this change without delaying time-to-market. What is the BEST approach?

September 18, 2026

You are managing a hybrid product development project where the hardware components follow a predictive approach with a 12-month timeline, while the software team operates in 2-week sprints. The hardware team has just informed you that a critical component will be delayed by 6 weeks due to supply chain issues. This delay will impact the integration phase where both teams must work together. The software team has already completed 60% of their planned features and is on track. Several stakeholders are pressuring you to maintain the original go-live date. What should be your FIRST action to address this situation?

September 16, 2026

You are managing a pharmaceutical product launch project using a hybrid approach. Clinical trials and regulatory submissions follow a stage-gate predictive model due to FDA requirements, while the marketing campaign and digital presence are developed using Scrum. The regulatory team has just learned that the FDA will require an additional study, delaying approval by 9 months. Meanwhile, the Scrum team has completed the e-commerce platform, mobile app, and digital marketing materials scheduled for the original launch date. The program sponsor is concerned about losing competitive advantage and wants options for generating value from the completed digital work. What is the MOST appropriate strategy?

September 16, 2026

Your hybrid construction and technology project involves building a new data center facility (predictive) while simultaneously developing the cloud management platform (agile). The construction phase has clearly defined milestones tied to building permits and inspections. The software team works in 3-week sprints and has been delivering features ahead of schedule. A major stakeholder from the facilities group has started attending sprint reviews and is now requesting detailed Gantt charts for the software deliverables, claiming they need predictability to coordinate facility operations planning. The software team feels this contradicts agile principles and will slow them down with unnecessary documentation. The stakeholder insists they cannot plan operations without concrete dates. What should you do to resolve this conflict?

September 16, 2026

Your organization is implementing a new customer portal using a hybrid approach. The infrastructure and security components are being delivered predictively with detailed requirements and regulatory compliance needs, while the user interface and customer-facing features are developed using Scrum. During the third sprint review, the Product Owner accepts several UI features, but the security team identifies that these features cannot be deployed to production because the underlying security framework (managed predictively) won't be ready for another two months. The development team is frustrated that completed work cannot be released, and the Product Owner is concerned about demonstrating value to stakeholders. How should you address this situation going forward?

September 16, 2026

You are leading an agile project to develop a web portal. During the sixth sprint, a major competitor launches a similar product with features that make your planned functionality less competitive. The Product Owner wants to immediately pivot and add new differentiating features, which would require abandoning nearly half of the current sprint backlog. The development team is concerned about the disruption and waste of partially completed work. There are four days remaining in the ten-day sprint. What is the best course of action?

September 9, 2026

Your agile team is working on a financial services application with strict regulatory compliance requirements. The compliance officer insists on reviewing and approving all completed work before it can be released, which takes 3-5 days. This has created a bottleneck, causing completed stories to pile up and not be truly 'done' by sprint end. Team morale is declining because their sprint goals are technically met, but nothing is actually reaching production. How should you address this situation?

September 9, 2026

During sprint planning for a software development project, your team is estimating user stories for the upcoming two-week sprint. One critical story that the Product Owner wants included has significant technical uncertainty. Three developers provide estimates ranging from 3 to 13 story points, indicating vastly different understandings of the work involved. The team has already committed to 32 story points of well-understood stories, and their average velocity is 40 story points. What should the team do with this uncertain story?

September 9, 2026

You are managing an agile project for developing a customer relationship management (CRM) system. After four iterations, the team has consistently delivered all committed story points, but customer feedback indicates that the features delivered are not addressing their most critical pain points. The Product Owner has been creating user stories based on what they think customers need rather than direct customer input. Velocity is stable, but customer satisfaction is declining. What is the most appropriate action to take?

September 9, 2026

Your agile team has completed three sprints of a mobile app development project. During the retrospective, several team members mention that the Definition of Done (DoD) is unclear, leading to inconsistent quality across user stories. Some developers consider a story done after coding, while others include unit testing and code review. The Product Owner is frustrated that stories marked 'done' often require rework in subsequent sprints. What should the Scrum Master do first to address this issue?

September 9, 2026

Your organization is transitioning a large, multi-year infrastructure program to agile delivery. The program consists of five interdependent product teams, each running two-week sprints. After three program increments, dependencies between teams are causing frequent delays—Team A cannot complete their sprint commitments because they're waiting for API specifications from Team B, while Team C's database changes block Team D's integration testing. The program board shows 47 active dependencies across teams. Teams are becoming frustrated with blocked work and declining morale. What approach would best address these systemic dependency issues?

September 9, 2026

An agile team developing a healthcare platform has maintained consistent velocity at 38 story points for six consecutive sprints. During the retrospective, technical debt items are repeatedly raised but never addressed because the product owner prioritizes new features to maintain competitive advantage. The lead architect warns that accumulated technical debt is increasing the time required for new features by approximately 30%, and estimates two full sprints would be needed to address critical technical debt. Code quality metrics show increasing defect rates and decreasing test coverage. What is the most appropriate action?

September 9, 2026

A distributed agile team across four time zones is developing an API integration platform. During the daily standup conducted via video conference, developers in the Asia-Pacific region consistently remain silent or provide minimal updates. The product owner mentions that several critical defects discovered by APAC developers were not communicated until the weekly status report, causing a two-day delay in resolution. Team velocity metrics show APAC contributions are significantly lower than other regions despite having equal headcount. What is the most effective approach to improve team collaboration and information flow?

September 9, 2026

Your agile team has completed three sprints of a mobile application project. The product owner consistently adds new acceptance criteria during sprint reviews, claiming these represent newly discovered customer needs. The team's velocity has dropped from 45 to 28 story points, and team members are frustrated with rework. The product owner insists all changes are critical for market competitiveness. Sprint planning for the next iteration is scheduled for tomorrow. What should the Scrum Master do first to address this situation?

September 9, 2026

During the eighth sprint of a financial services product, a regulatory compliance requirement emerges that affects the system's data retention architecture. The compliance officer estimates implementation requires 320 hours of effort, equivalent to four full sprints of the eight-person team's capacity. The product owner has a committed release date in six sprints to support a major client contract worth $2.3M annually. The current product backlog contains 180 story points of features promised for this release. The team's average velocity is 45 story points per sprint. How should the team approach this situation?

September 9, 2026